Not cricket

WELCOME TO RUFFER

All-weather investing

Seeking consistent positive returns.

Come rain or shine.

Ruffer provides investment management services for institutions, pension funds, charities, financial planners and individual investors.

London

Ruffer LLP
80 Victoria Street
London SW1E 5JL

Directions | Map +44 (0)20 7963 8100

Paris

Ruffer S.A.
103 boulevard Haussmann
75008 Paris, France

Directions | Map +33 (0)1 88 45 02 54

New York

Ruffer LLC
300 Park Avenue
New York NY 10022

Directions | Map +1 917 947 3003

Edinburgh

Ruffer LLP
31 Charlotte Square
Edinburgh EH2 4ET

Directions | Map +44 (0)131 202 1602

19 June 2024

Cricket has long seen itself as embodying the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship. But betting scandals over recent decades have exposed a murkier reality. The game needs to restore integrity and trust. Clear, robust governance would help.

Cricket isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. In the world of sport it stands out for two reasons. First, the game is complex. There are nine different ways for a batter to get out, and Wisden’s book of the 42 laws of the game runs to over 200 pages. Furthermore, new formats of cricket have proliferated in recent decades, each with its own particular rules and regulations. Even the most devoted fans struggle to keep up.

Secondly, cricket has long prided itself on its integrity and fair play. Sir Pelham Warner, one-time captain of England, wrote: “The very word ‘cricket’ has become a synonym for all that is true and honest. To say ‘that is not cricket’ implies something underhand, something not in keeping with the best ideals.” Ironically, he was writing before the notorious bodyline series of 1932-1933, which sparked a diplomatic row after England’s fast bowlers targeted the Australian batters’ bodies, rather than their stumps. Warner was the team’s manager.

Fall from grace, loss of trust

The truth is some cricketers have always been prepared to resort to sneaky ploys to gain an edge.

But the sport was truly shaken to its foundations by an incident at the turn of the millennium. Throughout the 1990s, Hansie Cronje was the captain and poster boy of South African cricket. He was even courted by Nelson Mandela, who used the colonial games of rugby and cricket to cement the bonds of the new rainbow nation through shared pride in multi-racial sporting prowess.

Then, in April 2000, Cronje was charged with match-fixing: accepting bribes from Indian bookmakers to lose games intentionally. Cronje’s fall from grace was total. When he eventually confessed, he was banned from cricket for life. (Tragically, it was a short ban, as he died in a plane crash two years later.)

But the scandal also cast doubt on the whole future of the professional game. Once you lose trust that all players will compete to the best of their ability, why would you spend good money to go and watch? Why would television companies spend millions to secure coverage – or sponsors to associate themselves with players?

And the trust wasn’t just lost in every game, but in every moment of every game. Cricket is blessed with a bewildering variety of statistics. Punters can bet not just on the outcome of the match, but on the number of runs made by a team or a batter, which batter will be out next, which bowler takes most wickets. You can even wager on the coin toss at the beginning of the match, or whether a team opts to bat or bowl first.

In 2010, after a newspaper exposé of illegal betting, two Pakistani bowlers and their captain were found to have conspired to bowl no-balls (illegal deliveries) at pre-determined points of the game. This sort of illegal betting on a segment of the game, rather than its result, is known as spot-fixing. All three were banned from cricket for years and received prison sentences after a criminal investigation.

Perhaps these scandals should have come as no surprise. If cricket’s laws are complex, so too is the game’s governance.

A question of governance

Perhaps these scandals should have come as no surprise. If cricket’s laws are complex, so too is the game’s governance.

Cricket was originally run from London by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), which to this day retains responsibility for – and copyright to – the laws of cricket. For many years, it also ran England’s national team. Nowadays, the global game is run by the International Cricket Council (ICC), which governs international competitions for all forms of the game, like the world cups, and appoints the umpires and referees. However, international matches between two nations are managed by their respective cricket boards, which are also responsible for running all domestic competitions at every level of the game. And there is a massive financial imbalance between these national cricket boards. Cricket is like a religion in India, and the wealth of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) dwarfs its counterparts, even in the traditional cricketing strongholds of England and Australia, giving it massive clout within the game. This level of decentralisation makes it easier for bad actors to take advantage of chinks in the governance armour, akin to regulatory arbitrage in the corporate world.

Complicating matters further, betting is illegal in some nations on the Indian subcontinent. That has helped spawn a massive and murky bookmaking black market, which is hard to investigate.

Mucking out the augean stables

After the Cronje scandal, the ICC established its Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU), led by an ex-Metropolitan Police Commissioner. During the early years, the ACSU was seen as underfunded and ineffective. It doesn’t help that its jurisdiction is limited to international fixtures, only investigating or monitoring domestic leagues when it is invited to do so.

The ACSU really kicked into gear after the Pakistani spot-fixing crisis. Since then, it has undoubtedly helped clamp down on match fixing in international matches. The players are now paid enough to be less susceptible to bookies’ enticements, and there are strict rules on dressing room conduct and access, as well as in-depth training for players on the potential pitfalls.

Certainly, the game has not gone into decline. Far from it: a range of new national competitions with different formats and more razzamatazz has attracted a younger, wider audience. At the same time, women’s cricket has surged in popularity, attracting more participants, television contracts and money.

Crypto fright

A surge in popularity, baffling complexity, a proliferation of innovative products, a smattering of devious behaviour, sketchy governance: the parallels won’t be lost on anyone familiar with the cryptocurrency arena. Of course, before crypto became seen as a low-effort path to a Lamborghini, a large part of its appeal was precisely that it was beyond the control of governments and central banks that were seen as incompetent or corrupt, imperilling the value of fiat currencies.

But the lack of regulation left the door open for bad actors. Just as less experienced cricket players may be groomed by bookies to fix matches, retail investors – typically less financially literate than their institutional counterparts – may be more susceptible to market manipulation, misinformation or outright fraud. Regulators, especially in the US, have woken up to the need for robust governance frameworks around the cryptocurrency ecosystem. FTX ‘Crypto King’ Sam Bankman-Fried and, more recently, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao have been found to have exploited the lack of governance controls and compliance oversight of their cryptocurrency exchanges.

But the lack of regulation left the door open for bad actors.

A timeless test

In any collective human undertaking, there will always be a tension between those who play by the rules and those who game the system. Cricket is no exception. Robust governance and strong management is key to both rooting out any malpractice and fostering the integrity which should underpin fans’ and players’ trust in the game.

GET IN TOUCH

Piers Wheeler

Director – Institutional

T +44 (0)20 7963 8258

Developing and executing asset management strategy for capital raising and strategic relationship management. Coverage includes EMEA, Asia and Australia. Piers joined Ruffer in 2021, having previously worked with asset management firms including Eastspring, AMP Capital and LEK as a strategic consultant. He holds a MA from the Bayes Business School and a BA (Hons) from the University of Oxford.

Annabel Paterson

Senior Associate – Institutional

T +44 (0)20 7963 8123

Joined Ruffer in 2021, having graduated with a first class honours degree in land economics from the University of Cambridge. After two years working with the UK Private Wealth team and completing her IMC and CFA Level I qualifications, she now supports Ruffer’s global business development and client servicing efforts.

Articles by Annabel

This article first appeared in The Ruffer Review 2024

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income derived therefrom can decrease as well as increase and you may not get back the full amount originally invested. Ruffer performance is shown after deduction of all fees and management charges, and on the basis of income being reinvested. The value of overseas investments will be influenced by the rate of exchange.

The views expressed in this document are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any investment or financial instrument. The information contained in the document is fact based and does not constitute investment research, investment advice or a personal recommendation, and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. References to specific securities should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell these securities. This document reflects Ruffer’s opinions at the date of publication only, and the opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained in this document has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable but it has not been independently verified; no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness, no reliance should be placed on it and no liability is accepted for any loss arising from reliance on it. Nothing herein excludes or restricts any duty or liability to a customer, which Ruffer has under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 or under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority. Read the full disclaimer

For US institutional investors: securities offered through Ruffer LLC, Member FINRA. Ruffer LLC is doing business as Ruffer North America LLC in New York. Ruffer LLC is the distributor for Ruffer LLP, serving as the marketing affiliate to introduce eligible investors to Ruffer LLP. More information about Ruffer LLC is available at BrokerCheck by FINRA. Any statements or material contained herein is for institutional investor use only and is not intended to be, nor shall it be construed as legal, tax or investment advice or as an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any securities. This material is provided for informational purposes only as of the date hereof and is subject to change without notice. Any Information contained herein, has been supplied by Ruffer LLP and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and cannot be guaranteed. Ruffer LLC makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, validity, or completeness of such information. Ruffer LLC is generally compensated by Ruffer LLP for finding investors for the respective Ruffer LLP funds it represents. Ruffer LLP is a registered investment adviser advising the respective Ruffer LLP funds, and is responsible for handling investor acceptance.

Ruffer Review

The Ruffer Review 2026

At a time of increasing political, economic and market disequilibrium, the Ruffer Review 2026 assesses a broad range of risks – and unearths some underappreciated opportunities.

210 mins |

Read

Ruffer Review

Iliads and Odysseys

We have entered a new era, where hard power rules. Safely navigating this New World Disorder will require the agile intelligence of Odysseus.

23 mins | Alexander Chartres

Read

Green Line

Strait lines, narrow choices

Apr 2026: With oil prices soaring, what will the impact on the global economy be? And how will policymakers react? We make the case for a stagflationary shock, but not all economies will be affected equally.

6 mins | Giorgio Curti

Read

London

Ruffer LLP
80 Victoria Street
London SW1E 5JL

Directions | Map +44 (0)20 7963 8100

Paris

Ruffer S.A.
103 boulevard Haussmann
75008 Paris, France

Directions | Map +33 (0)1 88 45 02 54

New York

Ruffer LLC
300 Park Avenue
New York NY 10022

Directions | Map +1 917 947 3003

Edinburgh

Ruffer LLP
31 Charlotte Square
Edinburgh EH2 4ET

Directions | Map +44 (0)131 202 1602

Your privacy matters

Not cricket