TINA turning?

Rising returns on cash may cause investors to withdraw from riskier assets such as equities and corporate bonds
The Green Line
Steve_Russell
Steve Russell
Investment Director

Ever since the authorities cut interest rates around the globe to zero (or near zero) in the aftermath of the credit crisis there has been a strong incentive for savers to hold risky assets. With the cash in the bank effectively yielding nothing, savers seeking any income were forced to buy riskier assets, predominantly equities and corporate bonds. This became known as the TINA trade – as in ‘there is no alternative’ for investors seeking any sort of income from their savings. 

Ever since the authorities cut interest rates around the globe to zero (or near zero) in the aftermath of the credit crisis there has been a strong incentive for savers to hold risky assets. With the cash in the bank effectively yielding nothing, savers seeking any income were forced to buy riskier assets, predominantly equities and corporate bonds. This became known as the TINA trade – as in ‘there is no alternative’ for investors seeking any sort of income from their savings.

Unsurprisingly this increase in demand from normally cautious savers has pushed up equity prices and lowered corporate bond yields. For example, pre-crisis the yield for investment grade US corporate bonds was normally in the 5-6% range, rather than the 2-4% level seen in recent years.

Now however, as the chart shows, there is an alternative. In the US at least, interest rates have risen steadily and offer a ‘risk free’ income of almost 3%. This is now not so far behind the income yield available from corporate bonds, with all their credit and liquidity risks.

Since 2009 the amount of money held by ordinary investors in US corporate credit mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has exploded from about $500 billion to almost $2.5 trillion1. At the same time, as we highlighted last month, the quality of this debt has deteriorated materially. Savers have flocked to these corporate bond funds and ETFs in such size because of the lack of any alternative source of income. These flows could easily reverse now that cash offers a decent alternative.

It is not just corporate bonds that are at risk from the allure of higher interest rates on cash. Last year just leaving cash safely sitting in the bank gave a higher yield than holding US equities. As if to confirm this savers have started to vote with their feet. As US rates have risen, private investors, along with mutual funds and institutions turned net sellers of equities in 2018. Only record levels of share buy backs from corporates, often funded with yet more debt, supported US equities last year.

Of course, such a return on cash in the bank is only available in the US with interest rates remaining rock-bottom elsewhere. But investment is a global industry and the US by far the biggest market, so any shifts in savings there will be felt around the world. The fact that cash is now an alternative option for savers is one of the reasons why at Ruffer we currently hold only a cautious 35% allocation to equities in our portfolio and have invested in protections against disruptive moves in credit markets.

Ruffer linkedin
Share on LinkedIn
Ruffer print
Print to PDF
Triple B or not triple B?
January 2019: Growing risks in corporate debt markets spell big trouble – and big opportunities
Read
Safe as houses?
March 2019: Over almost 30 years UK house price gains have outperformed the best of British businesses. What next?
Read
Infini-QE: helicopter money
April 2019: Central bank policies have favoured the ‘haves’ and the ‘have yachts’. Quantitative easing in the next crisis might look very different
Read

Chart source: Ruffer LLP, Bloomberg, Standard & Poor’s

Past performance is not a guide to future performance, investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. The information contained in this document does not constitute investment advice or research and should not be used as the basis of any investment decision. References to specific securities are included for the purpose of illustration only, they are not a recommendation to buy or sell.

our thinking
Investment Review
July 2021: We have been talking of inflation for well over a decade – which is not the same thing as calling its timing. An impasse was created by the failure of the economy to grow after the 2008 crisis – all the risks (as we patiently explained) were deflationary, and in vain did the central banks and governments try to force an inflationary impulse into a sluggish world.
Audio icon
Bitcoin – the future arrived early
July 2021: The best investments are often the least comfortable ones. This is certainly the case with our decision to add bitcoin exposure to our portfolios in November last year.
Responsible Investment Report
In our latest quarterly report, Investment Manager Rory Goodman examines the global significance of US President Joe Biden's new emission reduction targets announced at the Earth Day summit, and we share our stewardship and engagement activities during the second quarter of 2021.
Navigating information
It’s easy to be overwhelmed by the volume of information aimed at us. Inundated by a daily torrent of headlines, images, messages and data, we can be left feeling unable to process it to a satisfying degree. For investors, navigating information is central to being effective. Insights from information theory and gauge theory can help.
OUR THINKING – ALL ARTICLES
London
80 Victoria Street
London SW1E 5JL
Edinburgh
31 Charlotte Square
Edinburgh EH2 4ET
Paris
103 boulevard Haussman
75008 Paris, France